What Is A Judicial Review At The Federal Court Of Canada?

Mary Keyork
Follow Me

Judicial Review at the Federal Court of Canada

The Federal Court is Canada’s national court which hears and decides legal disputes arising in the federal domain. Immigration matters are dealt with as Applications for Judicial Review, which is narrower in scope than a full appeal. This means that the Court will only overturn in limited circumstances.

There is a 2 step process to have your matter heard at the Federal Court:

1. You must first file an Application for Leave and Judicial Review – this means that you are requesting permission to a Federal Court Judge to have your matter reviewed within a Judicial Review proceeding;
2. Should this permission be given (called “leave granted”), the Federal Court will then schedule a date for the Judicial Review hearing.

Just like the Immigration Appeal Division, a Federal Court Judge will not grant, issue or approve a Visa or application. The Federal Court will determine whether the decision of an immigration officer or a Board Member violated proper procedure or was reasonable or unreasonable. If the decision is determined to be unreasonable, the matter will be sent back for re-determination by a different officer or Board Member.

Any decision by a federal decision-maker can be judicially reviewed unless there is a first right of appeal. The refusals below can be directly judicially reviewed by the Federal Court of Canada:

• Federal Skilled Worker
• Canadian Experience Class
• Investor
• Provincial Nominee Program
• Live-in Caregiver
• Work Permit
• Study Permit
• Temporary Resident Visa
• Humanitarian and Compassionate
• Pre-Removal Risk Assessment
• Request for Deferral
• Spousal Sponsorship Appeal
• Family Class Sponsorship Appeal
• Residency Obligation Appeal
• Removal Order Appeal
• Refugee Claim or Claim for Protection

During a Federal Court Judicial Review hearing, the individual involved in the matter may not testify. The Federal Court will only rely on documentation available to the immigration officer or to the Board Member at the time the decision was made. Your immigration lawyer will submit argumentation and case law and the opposing party, the attorney representing Citizenship and Immigration Canada, will do the same. The lawyers will argue the case in person before a Federal Court Judge who will make the final decision.

Share :
Mary Keyork provides Immigration Law services for hundreds of immigration applications in all categories and has appeared before all three divisions of the Immigration and Refugee Board as well as at the Federal Court of Canada, successfully representing clients in complex immigration applications and hearings.
View Website
Related Posts
  • marksnoah@hotmail.com'
    Noah Marks


    My girlfriend is in China, her TRV was declined. Previously, her Post Grad work permit was declined because of an issued regarding her missing a deadline on a TRP (to leave Canada and come back to renew her status). Had this action occured, there would be no way to apply for the Post Grad work permit as they are applied for within Canada. From the very start, it was an unfair process. There is more to this story. Can you help? What are the fees for a Juducial Review and to argue her case. We are not looking to go bankrupt over this, just seeking a fair price for a fair hearing. Please let me know.

Leave Your Comment

nineteen − fourteen =